Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member les winter's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 8th, 2009
    Posts
    137
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    I have a pair of Model 19 enclosures and a choice to make about the lf driver. I own a pair of 416z from Valencia's. I have a pair of 16 ohm GPA drivers for the hf horn. I also have a pair of 8 ohm GPA hf drivers. So, I can build a passive x-o scaled to 16 ohms, or I could sell the 416z's and buy a pair of GPA 416-8C.

    Any guess as to the best choice?

    thanks
    Les

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,351
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Quote Originally Posted by les winter View Post
    I have a pair of Model 19 enclosures and a choice to make about the lf driver. I own a pair of 416z from Valencia's. I have a pair of 16 ohm GPA drivers for the hf horn. I also have a pair of 8 ohm GPA hf drivers. So, I can build a passive x-o scaled to 16 ohms, or I could sell the 416z's and buy a pair of GPA 416-8C.

    Any guess as to the best choice?

    thanks
    Les
    Build the crossover 8ohm, you can use a parallel non inductive resistor to bring the 16 down if needed, that way you can try either.

    Dayton Audio DNR-16 16 Ohm 10W Precision Audio Grade Resisto 004-16

    16 divide by 2 in parallel = 8 ohms
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member les winter's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 8th, 2009
    Posts
    137
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Thanks OG. If I hang a 16 ohm resistor across the woofer terminals, I think the Qts gets cut in half. The simulation show a really nasty curve after that.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C


    alancohen's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 26th, 2012
    Location
    Hunterdon Cty, NJ
    Posts
    684
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    There would be a voltage drop across the resistor. That leaves less output voltage to drive the woofer. It would suck the life out of the sound.

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member zelgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 25th, 2002
    Posts
    302
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    How so Alan? The paralleled resistor would reduce the resistance and so the voltage drop.

  6. #6
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C


    alancohen's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 26th, 2012
    Location
    Hunterdon Cty, NJ
    Posts
    684
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Quote Originally Posted by zelgall View Post
    How so Alan? The paralleled resistor would reduce the resistance and so the voltage drop.
    Oh duh...series resistor would cause the voltage drop. A parallel resistor would result in a current drop.

    It still sucks the sound out of the speaker. I just had to do this with my 300Bs. There was a woofer pumping going on at high levels and we were trying to figure out why. So I strapped a 5W across the terminals, which stopped the pumping, but it sounded like crap. We ended up making some value changes to the output capacitor as well as removing it from the feedback loop. Problem solved. But I'm not getting any design cred.
    Last edited by alancohen; June 25th, 2013 at 09:18 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,351
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Quote Originally Posted by alancohen View Post
    Oh duh...series resistor would cause the voltage drop. A parallel resistor would result in a current drop.

    It still sucks the sound out of the speaker. I just had to do this with my 300Bs. There was a woofer pumping going on at high levels and we were trying to figure out why. So I strapped a 5W across the terminals, which stopped the pumping, but it sounded like crap. We ended up making some value changes to the output capacitor as well as removing it from the feedback loop. Problem solved. But I'm not getting any design cred.
    My bad here.I read 16 ohm HF- those are more common. Resistive matching on woofs not so good.

    OTOH if the xover was 8, the HF could be resistive matched and the LF allowed to work into an upward mismatch. There may be minor issues, but an upward mismatch is much more forgiving.

    One good solution- get another pair of 416z and run the extra pair in boxes below the Valencias. WAF may suffer.
    Last edited by Old Guy; June 25th, 2013 at 12:16 PM.
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  8. #8
    Senior Hostboard Member les winter's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 8th, 2009
    Posts
    137
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Maybe I should have asked this question instead: All things being equal, which will sound better: a nw pair of GPA 416-8C or a vintage mint pair of 416Z?
    thanks for all the replies.

  9. #9
    Senior Hostboard Member voice of the theater's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 25th, 2009
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,412
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Since you're asking what will sound better and you're considering buying a new pair of GPA 416-8C, I'd recommend buying a new pair of GPA 416-8B. The alnico 416-8B is what's in both pair of Model 19's that I own and was the original driver in most Model 19's (until Altec switched from alnico to ferrite). Of course keep in mind that your question (which will sound better?) is subjective in nature and there may be a few out there that prefer the ferrite 416-8C over the 416-8B.....

    Quote Originally Posted by les winter View Post
    Maybe I should have asked this question instead: All things being equal, which will sound better: a nw pair of GPA 416-8C or a vintage mint pair of 416Z?
    thanks for all the replies.
    Being of "Sound" Mind

  10. #10
    Senior Hostboard Member badtoby's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 17th, 2010
    Location
    East of oz
    Posts
    118
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Model 19: 416z vs. GPA 416-8C

    Will Z's mount to a 19 cab?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 23808158 times.